Archive for October, 2007

Want to sell your home?

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

Joanne Hatherly, CanWest News Service

Despite what dear old Mom said, a lot of Canadians do judge a book by its cover, at least if the book is a house.

A recent study of Canadians shopping for a house found that first impressions, that is, a house’s curb appeal, matter more than price, lot size and square-footage.

Nationally, 46% of respondents said their yard catches their attention before anything else. The survey also found that 40% say that a deck or patio is the most important backyard feature to consider in a prospective home.

The study points to the importance of first impressions when it comes to selling a home.

“Curb appeal involves making small improvements to the inside and outside of the home that won’t cost a fortune, but can dramatically impact the look of your home,” says John DeFranco, Home Depot Canada’s merchandising director.

Here are a few tips from Home Depot on how to pretty up your house:

- Add potted plants around the doorway and porch. Place shrubs along the driveway and keep grass neatly cut to showcase your home.

- Repaint the garage door, front door and window shutters. Clean the windows.

- Renew hardwood by refinishing and staining it to make it look brand new. Consider replacing worn floors altogether.

- Update lighting fixtures and apply a new coat of paint to the house interior to erase the wear of everyday living.

- If you’re going to invest in renovations, consider starting with the kitchen, the most important room to prospective buyers. If that is beyond the reach of your budget, consider replacing the appliances and counters, then simply refacing the cabinets and hardware.

Leger Marketing surveyed 1,500 Canadian women between the ages of 18 and 49 years for this survey, which was commissioned by Home Depot Canada. The data was weighted against Statistics Canada to ensure a sample representative of the Canadian adult population. The maximum margin of error for a sample of 1,500 respondents is plus or minus 2.5 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

————————————————————————————————————

Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information - 416-388-1960

Parent trap

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

Why Hotel Mama keeps kids in the nest

Avi Friedman, CanWest News Service

Parents who live in single-detached homes in Canada’s largest cities are among the most likely to have adult children living at home with them, suggests a Statistics Canada study.

The data suggest that nearly 60% of Canadians aged 20 to 24 live with their parents, compared with just 41% two decades earlier.

In an age of early teenage independence and easy mobility, one would assume a reversed trend would prevail, that young adults would be eager to define their identity and move out as soon as they could to find their own place.

So why is Hotel Mama so convenient and addictive? Several phenomena have altered past trends. Some have to do with emerging socio-economic reasons, while others are rooted in new cultural attitudes.

The cost of housing has risen sharply in the past two decades. Young people often have to put their plans to rent an apartment on hold, as a single salary might no longer be sufficient to cover the cost in most of Canada’s large urban centres, and still leave money for much else.

The average age of marriage has also risen, now approaching 26 years for men and women. Newlyweds who are not supported by their parents often need to buy an affordable home far from downtown and then weave long commutes into their daily routine.

Alternatively, they might rent in town or continue to live with their parents until they have saved enough for a down payment on a home closer to their jobs.

A phenomenon once common in Canada, and still widespread in European households, sees married children living at home until they have saved enough to move out and buy.

A reverse practice is taking place in Japan, where parents help their child buy a home. In return, the married son shares his house with them, something the bride accepts as part of the marriage package.

The declining birth rate of Canadians is another reason behind the comfort of staying with mom and pop. Boomers have fewer kids than their parents had.

With 2.7 people per household, there is no pressure to move out of a house with more than enough bedrooms for all. There is, after all, no morning rush-hour line in front of the bathroom.

The average size of the Canadian home has also grown. A typical 1950s house, which measured 800 square feet, bears no resemblance to homes in 2007 where there are multiple bathrooms, bedrooms, and larger kitchens in 2,500-square-foot residences. There is enough space in new homes to pack in three dwellings from a century ago and still have fewer people living under one roof.

Economic changes have also affected how long offspring stay at their parents’ homes.

A first university degree is no longer sufficient to find a well-paying job, whereas 50 years ago, a high school diploma was a ticket to stable employment.

Competition has also upset the job market with a lack of security, and the reality of having to repay student loans means adult children do not have much financial room to leave home and buy early. Some students, paradoxically, elect to stay in university longer, obtaining additional degrees to improve their chance of getting a well-paying job.

Staying at home, where meals and laundry are taken care of, also makes economic sense.

Transformation of cultural norms has also contributed to the convenience of staying at home. In his best-selling book The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell describes how adolescent society has evolved in recent years to increase the potential for isolation. He suggests that parents are giving their children more money to construct their own social and material worlds. They have in-room TV, Internet, e-mail, beepers and cellular phones.

Young adults have created an independent physical and digital existence within their parents’ place. But with separate operating schedules and cultural interests, the time adult children and parents spend together is shrinking substantially.

Such phenomena might change the way housing will be designed and marketed in the future. Today’s large homes offer the opportunity to design an independent suite with a separate entrance, a bathroom and kitchen.

Space in the home has more territorial connotations as the young guard their domain. The child’s room, at times, can resemble an independent dwelling with entertainment devices and even appliances, like a small fridge.

As the boomers fast approach their retirement age, dreams of claiming the entire family nest all to themselves will have to be postponed, at least for a while.

————————————————————————————————————

Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information - 416-388-1960

Getting early start in property game

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

So you want to be a landlord - beginning young can be a major advantage when building a rental portfolio

Sarah Dougherty, Freelance

Gerard Philipps bought his first investment property at the tender age of 21.

His son Jonathan beat that record, buying a rental building when he was just 18.

“It’s the ongoing joke in the family,” Jonathan said of the friendly father-son rivalry.

Now 24, Jonathan Philipps has managed to grow his portfolio to four revenue properties in the Montreal suburb of Lachine - three triplexes and one with four units.

He bought these buildings by leveraging other people’s money, which helps revenue property investors compensate for small down payments and generate cash for future purchases. But the downside of high levels of debt is vulnerability to changing conditions, especially fluctuating interest rates.

Following in his father’s footsteps didn’t take any prodding, said Jonathan Philipps, a business school graduate who holds a day job as an analyst with the Montreal office of a real estate lending company.

“He didn’t push me into it,” Philipps said. “I wanted to buy.”

Philipps got a leg-up when he bought his first triplex in 2001: His father co-signed on the loan and offered a property as security.

But for his most recent purchase, a four-plex he picked up in January, Philipps didn’t need his father’s backing. He got an interest-only mortgage from the vendor for the balance of the purchase price - $200,000 - at 5.5 per cent. (The down payment was $58,000.)

The arrangement means that for the five-year term of the mortgage, Philipps pays twice-yearly interest instalments of $5,500 and no principal.

At the end of the five years, Philipps plans on refinancing the mortgage with a bank, but based on the reappraised value of the building, which he projects will have increased, allowing him to take out a larger loan.

He hopes to make his refinanced mortgage a high-ratio one - about 85 per cent of the building’s value.

“You can keep your money to invest in other properties and your cash flow is available,” Philipps said of his rationale for taking an interest-only mortgage.

From the seller’s point of view, offering a so-called vendor-take-back mortgage makes the property attractive to buyers who cannot piece together all the necessary financing from an institutional lender, Philipps said.

Since the building is taken as security for the mortgage, risk is minimized.

Taking an interest-only mortgage frees up cash, but is usually expensive and increases exposure to interest rate fluctuations, according to Jean-Francois Bigras, chairman of the Corporation des proprietaires immobiliers du Quebec, an association of rental property owners.

He also gives courses on real estate investing and is a property owner.

Bigras took an interest-only loan at 8.5 % on a building he intended to keep for six months and resell. He says an investor’s time horizon will often dictate strategy.

“If you want to keep (the property) for a long time, pay down the mortgage so it becomes a cash cow,” Bigras explained. “If you want to sell it earlier for capital gains, why use cash to draw down a mortgage you will pass on?”

By law, high ratio loans - more than 75 per cent of the building’s value - like the one Philipps wants to obtain when it comes time to refinance, must be insured against default, either through Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. or a private mortgage insurer.

Although the borrower must pay insurance premiums, there is an upside, Bigras said.

Lenders will offer better rates on insured mortgages and “if the economy slows down, lenders will prefer CMHC mortgages because they’re risk free,” he said.

Bigras advises revenue property investors to crunch their numbers with higher interest rates than they negotiate on the initial mortgage term.

“If there is an interest rate switch when you renew, you may be in dire straits,” he said.

And if you don’t qualify for a bank loan, using a mortgage broker can open up other financing avenues, Bigras said.

Brokers usually deal with a range of lenders, including credit unions, trust and insurance companies, pension funds, private lenders and banks.

Bigras said alternative lenders might be willing to finance revenue properties banks tend to avoid, including buildings with smaller units (studios, for example) that have higher tenant turnover and buildings in less affluent neighbourhoods.

Mortgage consultant Pelagia Nickoletopoulos specializes in helping clients who aren’t a good fit for banks.

That includes buyers who are self-employed or who work on commission and don’t have sufficient declared income to satisfy a bank, but do have good credit ratings.

She also works with clients who have difficult credit histories.

“Bank rates are better, but they are based on declared revenues,” she said of the trade-off of using a non-traditional lender.

Based in Laval, Nickoletopoulos is affiliated with the brokerage firm Mortgage Architects. About half her business is placed through that firm, but she also deals with other lenders.

Nickoletopoulos jokes that she charges clients a black coffee for her services; she receives commissions from lenders and does not charge clients fees.

Some mortgage brokers do charge fees on top of the commissions they earn.

Revenue property buyers should also know that real estate agents and brokers might have agreements with financial institutions to refer business to those lenders and might receive compensation for these referrals.

Nickoletopoulos specializes in owner-occupied buildings with four units or less. She can get qualified clients “no cash down” deals on these buildings, although the mortgage must be insured.

“It shows you are serious if you live there,” she said about one reason financing is easier to obtain on owner-occupied properties.

Nickoletopoulos also knows tricks to boost clients’ credit scores, like regularly spending less than half your credit limit on credit cards.

She can also direct clients to institutions offering blanket mortgages, which are registered against two or more properties.

Normally used when a buyer wants more money than the lender will provide on the basis of one property, they are useful for investors who want to ramp up to more expensive properties.

Nickoletopoulos also helps owners withdraw equity from their properties and refinance them, so they can use the money to buy something else.

For his part, Jonathan Philipps wants to push the envelope more than his father did.

“I tell him ‘by refinancing, you could have bought more,’ ” said the budding tycoon, who is setting his sights on his next purchase. “I want to go bigger next time.”

————————————————————————————————————

Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information - 416-388-1960