Tag Archive for mortgage interest

RRSPs or TFSAs: Which is better to use when buying your first home?

Garry Marr – Financial Post

Do you really want to raid your retirement fund to buy your first home?

Nobody sets out to do it, but given the price of Canadian homes, some consumers almost have no choice but to take advantage of the federal government’s Home Buyers’ Plan. You can withdraw up to $25,000 from your RRSP to buy your first home, as long as you pay it back over 15 years. Considering the average home in Canada sold for $363,346 last year, two people with $25,000 each could use that money to get closer to the goal of having a 20% down payment — an important demarcation point because it means you can avoid expensive mortgage-default insurance.

But tax-free savings accounts are now in their fourth year, meaning each individual could have up to $20,000 in that account. The TFSA is becoming a real alternative when it comes to saving for a home.

So which should you use to buy your house?

“There is a huge premium if you sit down and do the numbers for taking it out from the point of view of missed opportunity in terms of growth,” Al Nagy, an Edmonton-based certified financial planner with Investors Group Financial Services, says of removing the cash. “Once you’ve taken it out, unlike a TFSA, that contribution room is not put back. You lose that contribution unless you create new contribution room in terms of new income.”

The loss in terms of sheltered income growth can be harsh, says Mr. Nagy, who cites a 30-year-old individual with RRSP valued at $30,000, earning 8% per annum on average. If there were no HBP withdrawal, the RRSP would grow to $139,829 by age 50 and $301,880 by age 60.

But take $20,000 out and repay it over 15 years and the RRSP would be worth $92,215 at age 50 and $199,805 at 60. Pay the $20,000 back over 10 years and the RRSP would be worth $100,237 at 50 and $216,404 at 60.

“The loss of RRSP growth by using the HBP would be mitigated by the savings in the mortgage interest expenses by reducing the size of the mortgage through the use of the HBP withdrawal,” he notes, adding people need to remember HBP repayment is a non-deductible expense.

“I don’t think we should forget the reason for the RRSP is to save for retirement.”

Don Lawby, chief executive of Century 21 Canada, still sees a strong need for the HBP and says it has yet to be replaced by the TFSA. “I think it still has some value. There is still a lot of confusion out there about the TFSA,” says Mr. Lawby, adding RRSPs remain more attractive to consumers. “People have a tough time saving for a down payment and it assists them to do that because those dollars are before tax.”

He adds there is a third alternative for those interested in buying a house. There is nothing to say you couldn’t use both accounts for a down payment. That could mean $90,000 for a couple and based on today’s home prices you might need that much cash to get to a 20% downpayment.

———————————————————————————————————————
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960

Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

———————————————————————————————————————

An easy way to lower household debt

By Alison Griffiths – Toronto Star MoneyVille

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is performing a delicate balancing act trying to rein in Canada burgeoning household debt, much of which is associated with housing, by placing additional restrictions on mortgages and home equity loans.

Among Flaherty’s changes, announced on Monday but not to take effect before 60 days, is that the government (through CMHC) would no longer insure mortgages amortized longer than 30 years.  He also announced that Ottawa will no longer provide insurance on lines of credit secured by home equity.  And when Canadians refinance their homes, the maximum they can now borrow is 85 per cent of the property’s value down from 90 per cent.

However, Flaherty is counting on the housing sector to power Canada’s weak recovery from recession.  And some experts, notably BMO Nesbitt Burns deputy chief economist Douglas Porter, are predicting the reduction in amortization from 35 to 30 years could cut house prices by as much as 7 per cent in the coming year.

Though other experts are less pessimistic, Flaherty is still playing a dangerous game. Any dampening of the housing sector will likely serve to increase consumer debt, at least in the short term.

I’m all for lowering the debt load of Canadians, but I’d like to suggest Mr. Flaherty be a little more daring, and give something back to the little guy and girl, by making mortgage interest tax deductible, as it is in the United States.

Depending on marginal tax rates, the average home owning family would end up with a nice tax refund which could be used to pay down debt, contribute to savings or spur on the economy through increased consumption — all very desirable things.

There are some in the U.S. who believe that tax deductible mortgage interest has contributed to unhealthy indebtedness south of the border, as individuals borrowed more because the deduction made it affordable. Even if true, I’m confident that won’t happen in Canada.  Traditionally, credit practices have been more restrictive here than in the U.S. and, when it comes to money, we’re generally more conservative than our neighbours.

I’m sure the Finance Minister is concerned about the optics of offering big tax breaks to owners of uber abodes.  But he could easily put a cap on the amount of interest deductible in order to benefit low to middle income families — those who need it most. What could be fairer than giving Canadian families a fighting chance to pay off debt with their own money!

————————————————————————————————————–

Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information  -  416-388-1960

————————————————————————————————————–

Incoming search terms for the article: